Connect with us

Trending Stories

Lekki-Ikoyi Bridge Toll To Continue Pending Appeal




A Federal High Court in Lagos, which declared toll collection on Lekki-Ikoyi bridge in Lagos illegal, has ordered a stay of execution of the judgment.

Justice Saliu Saidu, in a ruling on Friday, granted the application for stay of execution filed by the Lagos State Government, on March 28, 2014, the day after the judgment was delivered.

With the court’s ruling, toll collection will continue on the bridge, pending the determination of government’s appeal challenging the judgment.

“I hereby grant the application for stay of execution of the judgment delivered on March 27, 2014, pending the determination of the appeal of the applicants,” Saidu held.

In his reaction to the ruling, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, the lawyer who instituted the suit in which the court delivered the judgment, said he was ready for the appeal.


“We will pursue the appeal. The ruling is just temporary; it is not a reversal of the judgment of the court,” Adegboruwa said.

The state government and the Attorney-General in the state, Mr. Ade Ipaye, who are both the 3rd and 4th respondents in the main suit, had filed the application for stay of execution on the grounds of its appeal against the court’s judgment.

The court rejected Adegboruwa’s allegation that the state government was not entitled to be granted the application because it had disobeyed the judgment.

“Though the respondent (Adegboruwa) has alleged that the applicants have disobeyed the judgment of court, a party cannot be held for disobeying an order he is appealing against,” the court held.

The court added that the application by the state government fulfilled the necessary legal requirements as its appeal and Adegboruwa’s cross-appeal against the judgment presented “arguable grounds of appeal” and “recondite and substantial legal issues” to be sorted out by the Court of Appeal.


The judge added that the facts presented before the court by the applicants, were in his view, “special and exceptional circumstances” which warranted the granting of the application.

The Attorney-General of the Federation and the National Inland Waterways were the 1st and 2nd respondents in the main suit.

The two parties, however, did not oppose the state government’s application for stay of execution.

The government had on March 28, 2014, a day after the judgment was delivered, filed a notice of appeal and an application for stay of execution of the judgment.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.